Mediekritik diskussioner
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 OBS att texter som är äldre än några dagar gamla ofta spärras för editering, så att länkar hit garanteras referera till det avsedda materialet.
 Cookies:  Liksom många websiter använder denna cookies och/eller liknande teknologier för att förbättra användbarheten, men det går att blockera cookies i sin webbläsare och ändå läsa siten.  En cookie är en liten datafil som sparas i den enhet du använder för att läsa siten.  Vi kan använda både tillfälliga cookies och sparade cookies.  Om du läser siten godkänner du att cookies används.

Vad sysslar de med i USA 19 juni 2006? BACK TO THE BUNKER!

Post new topic   Reply to topic Forum Index -> Mediekritik
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message

PostPosted: Mon, 2006 Jun 05 19:17:46    Post subject: Vad sysslar de med i USA 19 juni 2006? BACK TO THE BUNKER! Reply with quote

19 juni 2006 - vad sysslar de med i USA?

Den som skrivit nedanstående artikel - BACK TO THE BUNKER - är en insider - jobbar för Washington Post - så läs och tänk lite själv! Vad håller de på med i USA 19 juni 2006?

William M. Arkin writes the Early Warning blog for and is the author of "Code Names: Deciphering U.S. Military Plans, Programs and Operations in the 9/11 World" (Steerforth Press).

Det handlar om att upprätthålla terroristhotet - ge USA och dess bundsförvant Israel möjligheter att utsträcka sitt världsherravälde som Wolfowitz och hans sionistgäng i PNAC - Project for a New America Century utformade i september 2000 i skriften Rebuilding America´s Defenses - där de drömde om ett nytt Pearl Harbor = 11 september 2001 och vapen som kan utrota människor med viss genkod.

Läs om 9/11:

Läs Rebuilding America´s Defenses:

Läs om organisationen bakom planen - PNAC - Project for a New American Century:
Och läs om Wolfowitz lärofader Leo Strauss och hans tankar om att lura på människorna en historia för att våldta världen - Leo Strauss' Philosophy of Deception -
On the day of the 9-11 attacks, former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was asked what the attack would mean for US-Israeli relations. His quick reply was: "It's very good.Well, it's not good, but it will generate immediate sympathy (for Israel)"

Bankirerna som finansierade både Sovjet och Nazityskland


By William M. Arkin Sunday, June 4, 2006; Page B01

On Monday, June 19, about 4,000 government workers representing more than 50 federal agencies from the State Department to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission will say goodbye to their families and set off for dozens of classified emergency facilities stretching from the Maryland and Virginia suburbs to the foothills of the Alleghenies. They will take to the bunkers in an "evacuation" that my sources describe as the largest "continuity of government" exercise ever conducted, a drill intended to prepare the U.S. government for an event even more catastrophic than the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

The exercise is the latest manifestation of an obsession with government survival that has been a hallmark of the Bush administration since 9/11, a focus of enormous and often absurd time, money and effort that has come to echo the worst follies of the Cold War. The vast secret operation has updated the duck-and-cover scenarios of the 1950s with state-of-the-art technology -- alerts and updates delivered by pager and PDA, wireless priority service, video teleconferencing, remote backups -- to ensure that "essential" government functions continue undisrupted should a terrorist's nuclear bomb go off in downtown Washington.

But for all the BlackBerry culture, the outcome is still old-fashioned black and white: We've spent hundreds of millions of dollars on alternate facilities, data warehouses and communications, yet no one can really foretell what would happen to the leadership and functioning of the federal government in a catastrophe.

After 9/11, The Washington Post reported that President Bush had set up a shadow government of about 100 senior civilian managers to live and work outside Washington on a rotating basis to ensure the continuity of national security. Since then, a program once focused on presidential succession and civilian control of U.S. nuclear weapons has been expanded to encompass the entire government. From the Department of Education to the Small Business Administration to the National Archives, every department and agency is now required to plan for continuity outside Washington.

Yet according to scores of documents I've obtained and interviews with half a dozen sources, there's no greater confidence today that essential services would be maintained in a disaster. And no one really knows how an evacuation would even be physically possible.

Moreover, since 9/11 and Hurricane Katrina, the definition of what constitutes an "essential" government function has been expanded so ridiculously beyond core national security functions -- do we really need patent and trademark processing in the middle of a nuclear holocaust? -- that the term has become meaningless. The intent of the government effort may be laudable, even necessary, but a hyper-centralized approach based on the Cold War model of evacuations and bunkering makes it practically worthless.

That the continuity program is so poorly conceived, and poorly run, should come as no surprise. That's because the same Federal Emergency Management Agency that failed New Orleans after Katrina, an agency that a Senate investigating committee has pronounced "in shambles and beyond repair," is in charge of this enormous effort to plan for the U.S. government's survival.

Continuity programs began in the early 1950s, when the threat of nuclear war moved the administration of President Harry S. Truman to begin planning for emergency government functions and civil defense. Evacuation bunkers were built, and an incredibly complex and secretive shadow government program was created.

At its height, the grand era of continuity boasted the fully operational Mount Weather, a civilian bunker built along the crest of Virginia's Blue Ridge, to which most agency heads would evacuate; the Greenbrier hotel complex and bunker in West Virginia, where Congress would shelter; and Raven Rock, or Site R, a national security bunker bored into granite along the Pennsylvania-Maryland border near Camp David, where the Joint Chiefs of Staff would command a protracted nuclear war. Special communications networks were built, and evacuation and succession procedures were practiced continually.

When the Soviet Union crumbled, the program became a Cold War curiosity: Then-Defense Secretary Dick Cheney ordered Raven Rock into caretaker status in 1991. The Greenbrier bunker was shuttered and a 30-year-old special access program was declassified three years later.

Then came the terrorist attacks of the mid-1990s and the looming Y2K rollover, and suddenly continuity wasn't only for nuclear war anymore. On Oct. 21, 1998, President Bill Clinton signed Presidential Decision Directive 67, "Enduring Constitutional Government and Continuity of Government Operations." No longer would only the very few elite leaders responsible for national security be covered. Instead, every single government department and agency was directed to see to it that they could resume critical functions within 12 hours of a warning, and keep their operations running at emergency facilities for up to 30 days. FEMA was put in charge of this broad new program.

On 9/11, the program was put to the test -- and failed. Not on the national security side: Vice President Cheney and others in the national security leadership were smoothly whisked away from the capital following procedures overseen by the Pentagon and the White House Military Office. But like the mass of Washingtonians, officials from other agencies found themselves virtually on their own, unsure of where to go or what to do, or whom to contact for the answers.

In the aftermath, the federal government was told to reinvigorate its continuity efforts. Bush approved lines of succession for civil agencies. Cabinet departments and agencies were assigned specific emergency responsibilities. FEMA issued new preparedness guidelines and oversaw training. A National Capital Region continuity working group established in 1999, comprising six White House groups, 15 departments and 61 agencies, met to coordinate.

But all the frenetic activity did not produce a government prepared for the worst. A year after 9/11, and almost three years after the deadline set in Clinton's 1998 directive, the Government Accounting Office evaluated 38 agencies and found that not one had addressed all the issues it had been ordered to. A 2004 GAO audit of 34 government continuity-of-operations plans found total confusion on the question of essential functions. One unnamed organization listed 399 such functions. A department included providing "speeches and articles for the Secretary and Deputy Secretary" among its essential duties, while neglecting many of its central programs.

The confusion and absurdity have continued, according to documents I've collected over the past few years. In June 2004, FEMA told federal agencies that essential services in a catastrophe would include not only such obvious ones as electric power generation and disaster relief but also patent and trademark processing, student aid and passport processing. A month earlier, FEMA had told states and local communities that library services should be counted as essential along with fire protection and law enforcement.

None of this can be heartening to Americans who want to believe that in a crisis, their government can distinguish between what is truly essential and what isn't -- and provide it.

Just two years ago, an exercise called Forward Challenge '04 pointed up the danger of making everyone and everything essential: Barely an hour after agencies were due to arrive at their relocation sites, the Office of Management and Budget asked the reconstituted government to identify emergency funding requirements.

As one after-action report for the exercise later put it in a classic case of understatement: "It was not clear . . . whether this would be a realistic request at that stage of an emergency."

This year's exercise, Forward Challenge '06, will be the third major interagency continuity exercise since 9/11. Larger than Forward Challenge '04 and the Pinnacle exercise held last year, it requires 31 departments and agencies (including FEMA) to relocate. Fifty to 60 are expected to take part.

According to government sources, the exercise will test the newly created continuity of government alert conditions -- called COGCONs -- that emulate the DEFCONs of the national security community. Forward Challenge will begin with a series of alerts via BlackBerry and pager to key officials. It will test COGCON 1, the highest level of preparedness, in which each department and agency is required to have at least one person in its chain of command and sufficient staffing at alternate operating facilities to perform essential functions.

Though key White House officials and military leadership would be relocated via the Pentagon's Joint Emergency Evacuation Program (JEEP), the civilians are on their own to make it to their designated evacuation points.

But fear not: Each organization's COOP, or continuity of operations plan, details the best routes to the emergency locations. The plans even spell out what evacuees should take with them (recommended items: a combination lock, a flashlight, two towels and a small box of washing powder).

Can such an exercise, announced well in advance, hope to re-create any of the tensions and fears of a real crisis? How do you simulate the experience of driving through blazing, radiated, panic-stricken streets to emergency bunker sites miles away?

As the Energy Department stated in its review of Forward Challenge '04, "a method needs to be devised to realistically test the ability of . . . federal offices to relocate to their COOP sites using a scenario that simulates . . . the monumental challenges that would be involved in evacuating the city."

With its new plans and procedures, Washington may think it has thought of everything to save itself. Forward Challenge will no doubt be deemed a success, and officials will pronounce the continuity-of-government project sound. There will be lessons to be learned that will justify more millions of dollars and more work in the infinite effort to guarantee order out of chaos.

But the main defect -- a bunker mentality that considers too many people and too many jobs "essential" -- will remain unchallenged.

Last edited by on Mon, 2006 Jun 05 20:24:01; edited 10 times in total
Back to top
Leif Erlingsson
Site Admin

Joined: 28 Jul 2005
Posts: 302
Location: Tullinge, Botkyrka

PostPosted: Mon, 2006 Jun 05 19:25:30    Post subject: "9/11 The Sequel" Reply with quote

Ja, det är väl datum för "9/11 The Sequel". Jag skulle rekommendera att vi FÖRE detta datum informerar ledande politiker och alla vänner vi kommer på om att vad som än händer den där dagen, om det så är anfall av "aliens" och man kan visa upp kroppar och "UFO:s", så är det likafullt fake terror!

2006-06-06 12:40 - Tillägg: Jag har nu från en duktig analytiker att sannolikheten att den 19 juni är annat än en övning endast är kring 15%, och att det OM det händer något den dagen i så fall troligen är relaterat till kärnvapen och Iran. Däremot kan det vara klokt att förbereda sig för en världsvid epedemi från augusti eller senare. Att ha mat och vatten för ett par månader hemma, etc.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

PostPosted: Mon, 2006 Jun 05 19:50:05    Post subject: Reply with quote

Det finns tyvärr många som ropar: Vargen kommer!

Så vad ska människor tro?

Här är det några som ropar att vargen kommer redan 9-10 juni:

The true Bible code reveals the true nature of Hell and the unceasing and everlasting love that God has for every person whom he ever created, the wicked and the good alike. It reveals that there will be 7 terrorist nuclear bombs before Armageddon, which is the final man made nuclear holocaust. The first of these bombs will hit the UN complex in Manhattan between sundown on Friday June 9th and Sundown on June 10th, this year. The Bible Scholars have 2 independent scriptural interpretations which give the same week for this attack. Furthermore the attack must occur on a Sabbath according to both of the interpretations. For a simple explanation starting from the basics and ending with a nuclear bomb in at the UN in Midtown Manhattan during the 2nd weekend in June 2006, see

Här är en annan:
The following 'FALSE FLAG ATROCITY ALERT' was sent first class post to 650 UK journalists, all Mainstream Media Editors, all English Football Teams and to all members of the English World Cup Squad on 31st May 2006.

Israel Warns of World Cup Terror = ALERT MOSSAD Staged "False Flag" Atrocity
Note: This has to be taken seriously as similar warnings from Israel appeared on the Internet prior to both the Staged ‘False Flag’ Atrocities at New York 9/11 and London 7/7

All of the details on this page & links confirm that there is an extremely high likelihood of a Staged "False Flag" Atrocity on or around the 5th June 2006 – not necessarily on 6/6/6. Although it could happen anytime in that period, more evidence points to 5th June 2006 than 6th June 2006 and particularly if you include the required element of surprise. Everyone will be watching on the 6th, no-one will be watching on the 5th.
Subsequently Added: Occult Symbolism Indicates Enemies Within Our Own Governments

Här har vi en tredje som ropar att vargen kommer:
Former CIA Analyst Says Iran Strike Set For June Or July
McGovern: Staged terror attacks across Europe, US "probable" in order to justify invasion

Vad ska människor tro? De förlorar tron! Sen finns media - som ägs av bankerna - som kommer att förklara på sitt sätt vad som "verkligen" hände. De flesta litar på sina regeringar och media. De har inte tid att undersöka själva. Så vad en professor i fysik Steven E. Jones har konstaterat med hjälp av naturvetenskapen - som inte ljuger - förblir okänt:

Det tog 40 år för Operation NORTHWOODS att bli känt:
Klistra in länken i mediespelaren! File > Open URL

James Banford from ABC News reported on Pentagon's Northwoods plot to perp domestic terrorism in USA to blame a foreign nation and "justify" invasion, declassified in 2000, reported by ABC News on May 1, 2001

"Operation NORTHWOODS may be the most corrupt plan ever created by the U.S. government. Operation Northwoods had called for nothing less than the launch of a secret campaign of terrorism within the United States in order to blame Castro and provoke a war with Cuba."
—James Bamford, ABC News, "Friendly Fire - U.S. Military Drafted Plans to Terrorize U.S. Cities to Provoke War With Cuba," May 1, 2001

"In the early 1960s, America's top military leaders reportedly drafted plans to kill innocent people and commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities to create public support for a war against Cuba. Code named Operation NORTHWOODS, the plans reportedly included the possible assassination of Cuban émigrés, sinking boats of Cuban refugees on the high seas, hijacking planes, blowing up a U.S. ship, and even orchestrating violent terrorism in U.S. cities.

The plans were developed as ways to trick the American public and the international community into supporting a war to oust Cuba's then new leader, communist Fidel Castro. America's top military brass even contemplated causing U.S. military casualties, writing: "We could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba," and, "casualty lists in U.S. newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation."

The plans had the written approval of all of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and were presented to President Kennedy's defense secretary, Robert McNamara, in March 1962. But they apparently were rejected by the civilian leadership and have gone undisclosed for nearly 40 years. The Joint Chiefs at the time were headed by Eisenhower appointee Army Gen. Lyman L. Lemnitzer, who, with the signed plans in hand made a pitch to McNamara on March 13, 1962, recommending Operation Northwoods be run by the military.

Whether the Joint Chiefs' plans were rejected by McNamara in the meeting is not clear. But three days later, President Kennedy told Lemnitzer directly there was virtually no possibility of ever using overt force to take Cuba, Bamford reports. Within months, Lemnitzer would be denied another term as chairman and transferred to another job.

Ironically, the documents came to light, says Bamford, in part because of the 1992 Oliver Stone film JFK, which examined the possibility of a conspiracy behind the assassination of President Kennedy. "The scary thing is none of this stuff comes out until 40 years after," says Bamford."
—David Ruppe, ABC News, "Friendly Fire - U.S. Military Drafted Plans to Terrorize U.S. Cities to Provoke War With Cuba," May 1, 2001

Back to top

PostPosted: Mon, 2006 Jun 05 20:50:18    Post subject: Reply with quote

Vad gäller terrorism så sägs den här boken från 1997 vara utgångspunkten:

Läs mer:
Flight 93 - vad hände? Och mer nyheter!!!
Back to top
Leif Erlingsson
Site Admin

Joined: 28 Jul 2005
Posts: 302
Location: Tullinge, Botkyrka

PostPosted: Tue, 2006 Jun 06 12:40:43    Post subject: Det är ganska lugnt Reply with quote

Jag har nu från en duktig analytiker att sannolikheten att den 19 juni är annat än en övning endast är kring 15%, och att det OM det händer något den dagen i så fall troligen är relaterat till kärnvapen och Iran. Däremot kan det vara klokt att förbereda sig för en världsvid epedemi från augusti eller senare. Att ha mat och vatten för ett par månader hemma, etc.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

PostPosted: Tue, 2006 Jun 06 13:00:14    Post subject: Reply with quote

Det är ganska lugnt - skriver du. Det verkar vara ett så kallat understatement! om man ska tro dina påståenden som bygger på en duktig analytiker.

Om den här duktige analytikern vill bli trodd så borde denne presentera sina uträkningar eller vi har ytterligare en som ropar att vargen kommer.
Back to top

PostPosted: Thu, 2006 Jun 08 19:39:00    Post subject: Reply with quote

Det var då:
In July 2001, Alex Jones Warned of Globalist Plan to Use Bin Laden to Attack America

Och nu kommer det här:
Nexus Points Emerge For Potential Summer Attack
All indications suggest uncomfortable season of fear ahead

Och denne Alex Jones har också detta:
Pentagon Jettisons US Agent Provocateur Al-Zarqawi
Musab dies for the umpteenth time but this time its for real says the US government!
Back to top

PostPosted: Sun, 2006 Jun 11 22:41:42    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fler som varnar:
Lyndon LaRouche gick den 24 maj ut med en varning för att Bush-administrationen
under vicepresident Cheneys ledning på fullt allvar planerar att angripa Iran någon gång mellan nu och början av juli. Varningen bygger på uppgifter från välinformerade försvars- och säkerhetsexperter i USA och Europa, som pekar på vissa sammanträffanden under den nämnda tidsrymden.
Back to top
Leif Erlingsson
Site Admin

Joined: 28 Jul 2005
Posts: 302
Location: Tullinge, Botkyrka

PostPosted: Sun, 2006 Jun 11 23:28:57    Post subject: Kommentarer jag har fått i epost Reply with quote

Orginal länk:

Kommentarer jag har fått i epost:

Mycket konstigt har skett i USA, med hemligstämplade projekt av alla de slag. Jag har inte läst just de rapporter som du refererar till [från Disclosure Project], men jag har länge haft människor runtomkring mig som tror att en stor konfrontation med utomjordingar kommer att äga rum, och att kärleken kommer att härska i en folkförtunnad värld redan om ett 20-tal år.

De som står bakom dessa historier är ekonomer, som jet-settar runt i världen, och de är mycket intresserade av mass-psykologi av just den typen som experimenterades med i Rockefeller Foundations understödda Radio-utsändning "the War of the Worlds" den 30e oktober 1938 . Vad jag ser med mina ögon Leif, är mycket illusions-skapande, och rån på en skala som aldrig tidigare har setts på denna jord. Rånarna har redan ofattbart mycket pengar och makt, men de behöver ligga ett steg längre fram i sitt bedrägeri för varje dag som går, för att hålla ryggen fri!
Radio-utsändningen av Andrew Grove gave många specifika detaljer för att hjälpa till att identifiera de kriminella ( ) [ se kopia på ] ) men vi vet mycket väl att dessa kriminella hjälps från högsta ort av Pentagon och Vita Huset, eftersom hela projektet, kartorna på Iraks olje-fält, gas-pipe-lines i Afghanistan med mera sedan länge har diskuterats i PNAC och i diverse utskott av State Department och Energy Council. Det är alltför lätt att skylla på bara judar som styr bankerna, men det är korrekt att tidningarna själv-censurerar sig för de är rädda för hur bankerna och affärsvärlden skulle reagera om de skulle sätta igång och rapportera om dessa högst förrädiska handlingar.
För att styra vad som händer med de ofantligt stora mängder pengar som förskingras med dessa kriminella handlingar, så har man också behov av kriminella medarbetare inom bankerna, och som Silverstein så talande illustrerade så finns det också judar bland dessa hög-kriminella. Jag är ense med Kaminski's analys av det absurda som försiggår idag [en artikel vi diskuterade], men jag knyter inte ihop allt till en grupp judar. Däremot med en grupp högst kriminella miljardärer, associerade med kriminalitet från högsta ort inom det Amerikanska Ruttna Politiska systemet (inklusive mordet på JFK, och Iran Contra droghandeln) och äckliga typer från grupper som Yale's "Skull and Bones" bl.a..
Jag har också träffat fd Vietnam veteraner i USA som sedan jobbade med polisen i Washington DC och som klart hade en Harmageddon-filosofi, där det gällde att delta i att driva landet åt helsicke, eftersom man så klart redan valt lag med "syndarna", och var, enligt deras tro, ändå lovade en plats i Helvetet när slutet skulle komma... Man behöver möta den här typen av person för att kunna tro att de finns, de är ännu mer bort-tappade än Ku-Klux Klan följarna, och de har absolut inget att göra med judarna.

Eftersom insatsen nu är så stor, så kan vi förvänta oss ett nytt stort 911, så som t.ex. i samband med de kommande 19e juni övningarna. Det är alltså dags för oss att vara MYCKET MYCKET FOKUSERADE, för att få ett maximalt antal människor att förstå den verkliga faran, som behöver stoppas snarast.

Ovanstående via epost från en nät-bekant.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Leif Erlingsson
Site Admin

Joined: 28 Jul 2005
Posts: 302
Location: Tullinge, Botkyrka

PostPosted: Mon, 2006 Jun 12 0:20:37    Post subject: PS: Rekommenderad Googling: Reply with quote

PS: Rekommenderad Googling: "military-industrial complex" "cui bono"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Forum Index -> Mediekritik All times are GMT + 2 Hours
Page 1 of 1

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
HOME          Läs om Intelligentsians blockering här:          Besök AllaForum!