http://mediekritik.lege.net/
Mediekritik diskussioner
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 OBS att texter som är äldre än några dagar gamla ofta spärras för editering, så att länkar hit garanteras referera till det avsedda materialet.
 Cookies:  Liksom många websiter använder denna cookies och/eller liknande teknologier för att förbättra användbarheten, men det går att blockera cookies i sin webbläsare och ändå läsa siten.  En cookie är en liten datafil som sparas i den enhet du använder för att läsa siten.  Vi kan använda både tillfälliga cookies och sparade cookies.  Om du läser siten godkänner du att cookies används.

Se videos som visar Wolfowitz våldtäkt på världen

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    http://mediekritik.lege.net/ Forum Index -> Mediekritik
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
11-09-01.blogspot.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sat, 2006 May 13 23:02:41    Post subject: Se videos som visar Wolfowitz våldtäkt på världen Reply with quote

Se videos som visar Wolfowitz våldtäkt på världen

Martial Law 9/11: Rise of the Police State
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6495462761605341661&q=alex%2Bjones%2Bmartial%2Blaw&pl=true

Och se filmen The Corporation och du förstår lite mer:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4337948393302894067
och du hittar The Corporation här också:
http://informationclearinghouse.info/article12998.htm



Zionist War Crimes - The Case For The Prosecution
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8853425952359751341

Gangster Administration
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6595140034828257953&q=wolfowitz

Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Bush, and others planned Iraq Attach in 1998
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6058015001538860383&q=wolfowitz

David Ray Griffin: 9/11 Commission: designed for anything but the truth

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3227379873704596128
David Ray Griffin: 9/11 Commission Omissions: omissions and distortions
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-398081814159578985

Och läs planen för världsherravälde - Rebuilding America´s Defenses - http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article3249.htm - Wolfowitz och ett antal sionistiska judars plan från september 2000 där de talar om ett nytt Pearl Harbor som sen kom ett år senare 11 september 2001.



Wolfowitz skriver också om vapen som utrotar människor med viss genkod i den här planen. Fågelinfluensa för rödhåriga, blåögda, långnästa, krullhåriga, snedögda eller vilken grupp är det som han drömmer om att utrota?
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/pdf/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf



Läs om organisationen bakom planen - PNAC - Project for a New American Century: http://sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=PNAC
Och läs om Wolfowitz lärofader Leo Strauss och hans tankar om att lura på människorna en historia för att våldta världen - Leo Strauss' Philosophy of Deception - http://alternet.org/story/15935/



http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/fiveisraelis.html
Quote:
On the day of the 9-11 attacks, former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was asked what the attack would mean for US-Israeli relations. His quick reply was: "It's very good.Well, it's not good, but it will generate immediate sympathy (for Israel)"


Och mer läsning här - det handlar om att ta hand om oljan för att bygga den nya världsordningens - bankirernas - slavstat:
http://11september2001.blogspot.com/

Bankirerna som finansierade både Sovjet och Nazityskland
http://mediekritik.lege.net/viewtopic.php?t=134

Och ställ dig frågan - varför tiger våra medier!
Ta reda på vilka som äger våra medier!
Och vad tjänar de på att tiga om vad som händer i vår värld?
Medverka till att våldta vår värld genom att tiga om sanningen!



Oljan kräver bankirernas pengar och för till den globala slavstaten - det måste finnas alternativ till oljekrig och slaveri:
Vatten som bränsle med ny teknik! Så varför bråka om oljan?
http://mediekritik.lege.net/viewtopic.php?t=122

Och vi behöver var och en skapa lite frid i våra sinnen - meditera! för att hitta fram till fred - kunna diskutera fram lösningar istället för att ta till vapen.

Meditera för att förstå att allt är ett - sätta våra egna namn på detta enda eller låta det förbli namnlöst istället för att låta oss ledas av våldtäktsmän och kvinnor som leder oss med sina namn - sina religiösa namn - sina politiska namn - sina vetenskapliga namn o.s.v.

Var och en av oss behöver hitta tillbaka till ursprunget - det namnlösa ursprunget - det enda - för att få inre frid för yttre fred!

Back to top
11-09-01.blogspot.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sun, 2006 May 14 16:36:22    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hur ska vi alla kunna se till att bli tillfrågade? I Sverige har nu endast 0,04 promille rätt att ta beslut i gemensamma frågor - 349 riksdagsledamöter. Resten 99,996 procent får nöja sig med att ha beslutande folkomröstningar i Melodifestivalen.

I världen är det ännu sämre - FN är de globala bankirernas projekt - http://hem.passagen.se/globalworld/sagolandet.htm - cirka 200 representanter för sex miljarder människor. Hur ska vi alla kunna bli tillfrågade? Ett nytt UI - United Individuals - där alla har rätt att rösta - vara med om att ta beslut - knappa in ja - nej - avstår - på sina mobiler! Vara med om att fördela resurserna - istället för att bankirerna gör det! Det kanske går att hitta på något bättre - men hur ska det se ut?



Nu handlar det om BIS - Bank for International Settlements grundad av Hjalmar Schaht - Hitlers riksbankir:
Synarchism: The Fascist Roots of the Wolfowitz Cabal
Quote:
Historian Carroll Quigley, in his epic book, "Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time" (New York: MacMillan Company, 1966), described the BIS scheme to establish a dictatorship over world finance:

"The powers of financial capital had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences.

The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements) in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank, in the hands of men like Montagu Norman of the Bank of England), Benjamin Strong of the New York Federal Reserve Bank), Charles Rist of the Bank of France, and Hjalmar Schacht of the Reichsbank, sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world."


Och BIS kräver nu en världsvaluta:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2006/210206globalcurrency.htm
Quote:
BIS Calls For Global Currency
Nazi bankrollers want elimination of national sovereignty for world cashless control grid
Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | February 21 2006

The scandal-ridden and highly secretive Bank For International Settlements, considered to be the world's top central banking policy, has released a policy paper that calls for the end of national currencies in favor of a global model of currency formats.




http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leo_Strauss

Här nedan finns Leo Strauss tänkande som han lärt ut till Wolfowitz. Det handlar om egoism gömd under en altruistisk täckmantel. Och inte bara Wolfowitz har insupit det här tänkandet - det här undervisas det om i USA på universiteten. Det är ett fascistisk tänkande. Detta tänkande är politikers och medias tänkande nu i USA.

Det måste finnas andra tankar - demokratiska tankar. Och inte bara skendemokratiska tankar. Bush och Kerry är kusiner och de är bägge medlemmar av Skull and Bones vid Yale. Man har länge format en liten grupp som ska leda resten. USA är bara en skendemokrati. Media är inte i befolkningens händer. Hur ska vi kunna stoppa detta?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4286105/
Bush vs. Kerry? They’re distant cousins
Genealogy buffs claim political rivals are linked

Se en video om Skull and Bones från CBS: http://fpiarticle.blogspot.com/2004/11/cbs-on-skull-and-bones.html
Läs: http://www.bilderberg.org/skulbone.htm

http://alternet.org/story/15935/
Quote:
Leo Strauss' Philosophy of Deception

By Jim Lobe, AlterNet. Posted May 19, 2003.

Many neoconservatives like Paul Wolfowitz are disciples of a philosopher who believed that the elite should use deception, religious fervor and perpetual war to control the ignorant masses.


What would you do if you wanted to topple Saddam Hussein, but your intelligence agencies couldn't find the evidence to justify a war?

A follower of Leo Strauss may just hire the "right" kind of men to get the job done – people with the intellect, acuity, and, if necessary, the political commitment, polemical skills, and, above all, the imagination to find the evidence that career intelligence officers could not detect.

The "right" man for Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, suggests Seymour Hersh in his recent New Yorker article entitled 'Selective Intelligence,' was Abram Shulsky, director of the Office of Special Plans (OSP) – an agency created specifically to find the evidence of WMDs and/or links with Al Qaeda, piece it together, and clinch the case for the invasion of Iraq.

Like Wolfowitz, Shulsky is a student of an obscure German Jewish political philosopher named Leo Strauss who arrived in the United States in 1938. Strauss taught at several major universities, including Wolfowitz and Shulsky's alma mater, the University of Chicago, before his death in 1973.

Strauss is a popular figure among the neoconservatives. Adherents of his ideas include prominent figures both within and outside the administration. They include 'Weekly Standard' editor William Kristol; his father and indeed the godfather of the neoconservative movement, Irving Kristol; the new Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence, Stephen Cambone, a number of senior fellows at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) (home to former Defense Policy Board chairman Richard Perle and Lynne Cheney), and Gary Schmitt, the director of the influential Project for the New American Century (PNAC), which is chaired by Kristol the Younger.

Strauss' philosophy is hardly incidental to the strategy and mindset adopted by these men – as is obvious in Shulsky's 1999 essay titled "Leo Strauss and the World of Intelligence (By Which We Do Not Mean Nous)" (in Greek philosophy the term nous denotes the highest form of rationality). As Hersh notes in his article, Shulsky and his co-author Schmitt "criticize America's intelligence community for its failure to appreciate the duplicitous nature of the regimes it deals with, its susceptibility to social-science notions of proof, and its inability to cope with deliberate concealment." They argued that Strauss's idea of hidden meaning, "alerts one to the possibility that political life may be closely linked to deception. Indeed, it suggests that deception is the norm in political life, and the hope, to say nothing of the expectation, of establishing a politics that can dispense with it is the exception."

Rule One: Deception

It's hardly surprising then why Strauss is so popular in an administration obsessed with secrecy, especially when it comes to matters of foreign policy. Not only did Strauss have few qualms about using deception in politics, he saw it as a necessity. While professing deep respect for American democracy, Strauss believed that societies should be hierarchical – divided between an elite who should lead, and the masses who should follow. But unlike fellow elitists like Plato, he was less concerned with the moral character of these leaders. According to Shadia Drury, who teaches politics at the University of Calgary, Strauss believed that "those who are fit to rule are those who realize there is no morality and that there is only one natural right – the right of the superior to rule over the inferior."

This dichotomy requires "perpetual deception" between the rulers and the ruled, according to Drury. Robert Locke, another Strauss analyst says,"The people are told what they need to know and no more." While the elite few are capable of absorbing the absence of any moral truth, Strauss thought, the masses could not cope. If exposed to the absence of absolute truth, they would quickly fall into nihilism or anarchy, according to Drury, author of 'Leo Strauss and the American Right' (St. Martin's 1999).

Second Principle: Power of Religion

According to Drury, Strauss had a "huge contempt" for secular democracy. Nazism, he believed, was a nihilistic reaction to the irreligious and liberal nature of the Weimar Republic. Among other neoconservatives, Irving Kristol has long argued for a much greater role for religion in the public sphere, even suggesting that the Founding Fathers of the American Republic made a major mistake by insisting on the separation of church and state. And why? Because Strauss viewed religion as absolutely essential in order to impose moral law on the masses who otherwise would be out of control.

At the same time, he stressed that religion was for the masses alone; the rulers need not be bound by it. Indeed, it would be absurd if they were, since the truths proclaimed by religion were "a pious fraud." As Ronald Bailey, science correspondent for Reason magazine points out, "Neoconservatives are pro-religion even though they themselves may not be believers."

"Secular society in their view is the worst possible thing,'' Drury says, because it leads to individualism, liberalism, and relativism, precisely those traits that may promote dissent that in turn could dangerously weaken society's ability to cope with external threats. Bailey argues that it is this firm belief in the political utility of religion as an "opiate of the masses" that helps explain why secular Jews like Kristol in 'Commentary' magazine and other neoconservative journals have allied themselves with the Christian Right and even taken on Darwin's theory of evolution.

Third Principle: Aggressive Nationalism

Like Thomas Hobbes, Strauss believed that the inherently aggressive nature of human beings could only be restrained by a powerful nationalistic state. "Because mankind is intrinsically wicked, he has to be governed," he once wrote. "Such governance can only be established, however, when men are united – and they can only be united against other people."

Not surprisingly, Strauss' attitude toward foreign policy was distinctly Machiavellian. "Strauss thinks that a political order can be stable only if it is united by an external threat," Drury wrote in her book. "Following Machiavelli, he maintained that if no external threat exists then one has to be manufactured (emphases added)."

"Perpetual war, not perpetual peace, is what Straussians believe in," says Drury. The idea easily translates into, in her words, an "aggressive, belligerent foreign policy," of the kind that has been advocated by neocon groups like PNAC and AEI scholars – not to mention Wolfowitz and other administration hawks who have called for a world order dominated by U.S. military power. Strauss' neoconservative students see foreign policy as a means to fulfill a "national destiny" – as Irving Kristol defined it already in 1983 – that goes far beyond the narrow confines of a " myopic national security."

As to what a Straussian world order might look like, the analogy was best captured by the philosopher himself in one of his – and student Allen Bloom's – many allusions to Gulliver's Travels. In Drury's words, "When Lilliput was on fire, Gulliver urinated over the city, including the palace. In so doing, he saved all of Lilliput from catastrophe, but the Lilliputians were outraged and appalled by such a show of disrespect."

The image encapsulates the neoconservative vision of the United States' relationship with the rest of the world – as well as the relationship between their relationship as a ruling elite with the masses. "They really have no use for liberalism and democracy, but they're conquering the world in the name of liberalism and democracy," Drury says.


Last edited by 11-09-01.blogspot.com on Mon, 2006 May 15 14:09:13; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
11-09-01.blogspot.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sun, 2006 May 14 18:55:02    Post subject: Reply with quote

Är det här sättet - Everybody's Gotta Learn Sometime 1.0 - att stoppa Leo Strauss - Wolfowitz - politikers - media maffians tänkande - är det här sättet att få människor att vakna - http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6757267008400743688 - en konstnärlig video - en scratchad video - som blandar stillbilder med musik och någon slags rapp. Den här videon distanserar sig från den nära samtiden gör någon slags berättelse - saga om vår tid. Det är kanske det vi behöver - fångade i nuets nyhetsflöde eller kraftfulla påståenden. Låta oss distanserat se på oss själva - meditera över vår egen tid.

Back to top
11-09-01.blogspot.com
Guest





PostPosted: Wed, 2006 May 17 1:44:25    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dr. Michael Parenti: "Terrorism, Globalization and Conspiracy"
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article11635.htm
Back to top
11-09-01.blogspot.com
Guest





PostPosted: Wed, 2006 May 17 1:49:48    Post subject: Reply with quote

Många videos som visar motståndet mot Bushregimen.
http://www.truthout.org/multimedia.htm
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    http://mediekritik.lege.net/ Forum Index -> Mediekritik All times are GMT + 2 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
HOME          Läs om Intelligentsians blockering här: http://blog.lege.net/          Besök AllaForum!